Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP Auto Semver #17

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024
Merged

WIP Auto Semver #17

merged 5 commits into from
Aug 27, 2024

Conversation

isontheline
Copy link
Owner

@isontheline isontheline commented Aug 27, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced automated workflows for building the VSCode SysMon project and checking labels on pull requests.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Reset the version number of the VSCode SysMon extension, indicating a significant change in development strategy.
  • Chores

    • Enhanced dependency management by adding a "patch" label to the renovate configuration.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 27, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces two new GitHub Actions workflows: one for automating the build process of the VSCode SysMon project and another for checking labels on pull requests. Additionally, it modifies the version number in the package.json file and enhances the renovate.json configuration by adding a new label for dependency updates. These changes aim to streamline development and improve version management.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/build.yml New workflow to automate the build process for VSCode SysMon, including Node.js setup and version generation.
.github/workflows/label_check.yml New workflow to check labels on pull requests, ensuring they conform to defined categories.
package.json Version updated from "1.0.3" to "0.0.0," indicating a potential reset in versioning strategy.
renovate.json Added "patch" label to the existing labels array for better dependency categorization.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub
    participant Build Workflow
    participant Label Checker

    User->>GitHub: Push code
    GitHub->>Build Workflow: Trigger build
    Build Workflow->>GitHub: Checkout repository
    Build Workflow->>Node.js: Setup Node.js
    Build Workflow->>Versioning: Generate semantic version
    Build Workflow->>GitHub: Update frontend version

    User->>GitHub: Open pull request
    GitHub->>Label Checker: Trigger label check
    Label Checker->>GitHub: Verify labels
Loading

Poem

🐇 In the garden of code, we hop and play,
With labels and builds, we brighten the day.
A version reset, a fresh start anew,
With workflows in place, our dreams will come true!
So let’s dance through the branches, let our code sing,
For every new change, oh, what joy it will bring! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@isontheline isontheline added the patch Patch Feature Related label Aug 27, 2024
@isontheline isontheline merged commit db4b0eb into main Aug 27, 2024
4 of 5 checks passed
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 55fc984 and 52f9481.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/build.yml (1 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/label_check.yml (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
  • renovate.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • package.json
  • renovate.json
Additional comments not posted (8)
.github/workflows/label_check.yml (3)

1-9: LGTM!

The workflow name is clear and descriptive. The trigger events cover common pull request activities.

The code changes are approved.


10-13: LGTM!

The job name is clear and descriptive. The use of ubuntu-latest is appropriate for a GitHub Actions workflow.

The code changes are approved.


14-18: LGTM!

The job steps are clear and correctly configured. The one_of parameter ensures that one of the required labels is present. The repo_token parameter is correctly set to use the GitHub token.

The code changes are approved.

.github/workflows/build.yml (5)

1-3: LGTM!

The workflow name is clear and descriptive. The trigger event is appropriate for a build workflow.

The code changes are approved.


4-6: LGTM!

The concurrency control configuration is appropriate and helps manage workflow runs efficiently.

The code changes are approved.


7-15: LGTM!

The job name is clear and descriptive. The use of ubuntu-latest is appropriate for a GitHub Actions workflow. The timeout and permissions are correctly configured.

The code changes are approved.


16-23: LGTM!

The job steps for preparing the job are correctly configured. Checking out the repository with full history is useful for some build processes. Setting up Node.js with version 22 is appropriate for a Node.js project.

The code changes are approved.


24-37: LGTM!

The job steps for creating the release semver and setting the project version are correctly configured. The use of the K-Phoen/semver-release-action is appropriate for generating semantic versions. Setting the frontend version using the generated semantic version ensures consistency.

The code changes are approved.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
patch Patch Feature Related
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant